Adikkada avne adikk ( hit him man hit him)…kollada avne koll ( Kill him dude)
Bhai maar aur zor se maar ( Bro hit him hard , hit him more)
The chorus that echoed in the theatre when the action sequel of the hero started. The adrenaline rush was reflected in each voice of the audience in that theatre cheering each punch, kick, stab and what not ways a man can be killed…
And after the movie ended a group of men in their 20’s walking out of the theatre and talking about the satisfaction they received after seeing the savagery in the movie…
Has anyone wondered why so much of violence is creating a fan base and making movies a blockbuster hit?
In recent times, if we have a glimpse of any movie, be it Bollywood, Kollywood, mollywood…violence has become a part of them, evoking a rush of emotions in the audience. We have witnessed a noticeable escalation in the depiction of violence and bloodshed within the cinematic landscape. From graphic action sequences to increasingly disturbing horror films, this trend permeates various genres, raising concerns about its potential impact on viewers.
“Pani” is a gritty exploration of violence in the Malayalam film landscape. Joju George’s directorial debut, “Pani,” is a hard-hitting action thriller that doesn’t shy away from showing the harsh reality of the criminal underworld. The film contains multiple strong and explicit scenes of violence, including gunfights, hand-to-hand combat, and severe brutality.
While some viewers found the level of violence disturbing, it serves a crucial purpose within the narrative. “Pani” aims to portray the harsh consequences of a life of crime, showcasing the physical and psychological toll it takes on individuals.
The violence is not gratuitous; it’s an integral part of the film’s exploration of themes like ambition, betrayal, and the consequences of one’s choices.
The film’s gritty realism and unflinching portrayal of violence have garnered both praise and criticism. Some viewers have applauded “Pani” for its raw and uncompromising approach, while others have expressed concerns about the potential impact of such graphic content on audiences.
“Pani” undoubtedly pushes the boundaries of violence in Malayalam cinema. Whether it succeeds in its artistic intent or crosses the line into gratuitous exploitation is a matter of subjective interpretation. However, it undeniably adds a new dimension to the evolving landscape of Malayalam action cinema.
And when we peep into Bollywood movies the name that pops up when violence is stated is Animal.
The film “Animal” has faced criticism for its graphic depiction of violence, particularly in scenes involving throat slitting and other brutal acts. Some viewers and critics have expressed concern that this level of violence may be desensitizing or glorify violence in real life.
However, others argue that the violence in “Animal” is justified as a means of exploring the dark side of human nature and the consequences of unchecked aggression. The film’s director has stated that the violence was intended to be shocking and disturbing, reflecting the harsh realities of the criminal underworld it portrays.
The controversy surrounding “Animal” highlights the ongoing debate about the role of violence in cinema and its potential impact on audiences.
But killing all criticisms of Animal a new movie has emerged in mollywood creating havoc.
A recent movie, MARCO is becoming the highest-grossing A-rated Malayalam film of all time surpassing any movie in Indian history, including throat slitting, limb dismemberment, and other brutal acts.
The film’s intense and uncompromising depiction of violence has sparked debate among viewers and critics.
The film is directed by Haneef Adeni and is produced by Cubes Entertainment and Unni Mukundan Films. Unni Mukundan co-stars in the film with Siddique, Jagadish, Abhimanyu S Thilakan, Kabir Duhan Singh, Anson Paul, and Yukti Tareja. It portrays violence in different gross ways leaving people in wonder how so many people of a family can be killed in different ways.
Director Haneef Adeni has stated that the violence in “Marco” was intended to be shocking and disturbing, reflecting the harsh realities of the criminal underworld it portrays. The film’s makers have also emphasized its entertainment value, highlighting its action-packed sequences and visual appeal.
Movies often offer a temporary escape from everyday life, violence has become a trend and brutality has become a way to experience excitement and intensity in a controlled environment. The release of adrenaline, creating a thrilling experience in the audience and in recent times it is becoming a favourite part of the attraction in a movie.
“Marco” has generated significant buzz, particularly for its intense and brutal scenes. The film’s release has been accompanied by warnings about its graphic content, advising viewers to exercise discretion.
The controversy surrounding “Marco” highlights the ongoing debate about the role of violence in cinema and its potential impact on audiences.
Violence has often been a part of human history and culture, and movies are providing a way to explore and understand these themes but is it good for people, can it be an influence?
When I sat in that theatre to watch that movie all I could see were the audience with eager eyes to see the fight, bloodshed and brutality in the movie. At a point I realised I closed my eyes because the kind of brutality it showed was overwhelming for a person.
Critics argue that the increasing graphic nature of violence in films can desensitize viewers to real-world violence, potentially leading to increased aggression and antisocial behavior. Studies have shown a correlation between exposure to media violence and increased aggression in children and adolescents.
The entertainment industry often defends the use of violence in films as a form of artistic expression or as a way to address social issues. They argue that violence can be used to explore complex themes and evoke strong emotions in viewers. Additionally, the demand for increasingly graphic and violent content is often cited as a factor driving this trend.
The argument over the impact of violence in films continues, with no easy answers. While some demand for tougher restrictions and content ratings, others promote personal responsibility and media literacy. It is critical to have an open discussion about this subject and explore the potential consequences of media violence on our society.
However, it is crucial to emphasise that correlation does not imply causation, and other variables such as individual personality and social context can play a role.As viewers become acclimated to more explicit depictions of violence, directors may feel forced to increase the intensity in order to maintain viewer attention. This results in a cyclical effect in which more graphic information is required to shock and delight.
As a viewer tell us what you felt and feel..
